Scientology A
New Slant on Life - 9 Chapters Deleted. Why?
jbTrendy Ex JeanTox le dimanche
27.10.12
En réponse à un très bon article de Safe qui vient de créer
un nouveau forum qui dénonce les dérives sectaires et totalitaires de l'église
officielle de $cientologie auquel je m'addresse en tant qu'Ex Scientologue
officier des relations publiques personnelles de Laffayette Ronald Hubbard dit
LRH ou Ron pour ses amis qui a découvert et dévellopé la philosophie religieuse
et appliquée de Scientologie qui s'est transformée au fil des années et
notamment depuis la mort de son fondateur en 1986 dans la plus abominable des
machinations pour dominer, contrôler, dépouiller, oppresser, esclavagiser et
par là même affaiblir ses membres et fidèles de par le monde. Ceci témoigne de
ma volonté effective de rébellion contre ce dévoiement terrifiant d'un
mouvement que j'ai soutenu et dont j'ai promulgué la cause pendant 15 ans entre
1987 et 2002 avant d'en être expulsé pour en avoir dénoncé les pratiques en
interne. jbTrendy
Progressive
Scientology 23.10.12
The article
I wrote in 1999 about the 9 OMITTED chapters from Scientology: A New Slant On
Life, bares repeating again:
Scientology
A New Slant on Life - 9 Chapters Deleted. Why?
The
hardback L. Ron Hubbard Library version of the New Slant On Life (Copyright
1988, 1990) says in it's editorial forward ...
"This
book, first published in 1965, contains basic Scientology information anyone
can use t
o
effectively better his or her life. In producing this new edition, a careful
study of the author's literary archives was conducted, yielding ADDITIONAL
[emphasis mine] material he wrote for this work after its initial
release."
In the
above forward, the "editors" MISLEAD Scientologists by saying
ADDITIONAL material was added (the presumption is original material PLUS), yet
they utterly failed to announce that they DELETED the following 9 chapters from
the original 1965 "By L. Ron Hubbard" version .... WHY???
1. The
Reason Why
2. The Conditions of Existence
3. Myths of the Mind
4. The Man Who Succeeds
5. On Death of the Consciousness
6. Accent on Ability
7. Freedom vs Entrapment
8. The Human Mind
9. Communication
1) Is it
believable these 9 chapter deletions in NSOL were made per LRH order?
2) Why are
these 9 missing chapters no longer important to this introductory book?
3) Were
they put in other revised books where it seemed the subject matter of those
chapters fits better? Where?
4) Are we
looking again at some kind of internal "reform"?
5) Is
somebody thinking they know better about what some public would be more
comfortable reading?
6) Who
makes these LRH book altering decisions?
7) Why
don't parishioners notice or care?
8) Why was
the vital basic subject of communication even taken out of this introductory
book on Scientology (NSOL) in the first place?
9) Why
doesn't the altered L. Ron Hubbard Library version (from the original) not
contain ANY chapters about communication?
The
Communications Course has LONG been the best introductory to Scientology. Yet,
ironically, the subject is now DELETED in Scientology's most basic introductory
book?
I also
found it peculiar that there is NO chapter on FREEDOM in the altered "L.
Ron Hubbard Library" version. This is curious considering that FREEDOM is
what Scientology is suppose to be about.
In the
"By L. Ron Hubbard" version (the original), there is that classic
chapter called "Freedom vs. Entrapment."
10) Why are
these vital elements of Scientology (communication and freedom) NOT in the
altered LRH Library version?
11) Isn't
it an out-point that the editors of the L. Ron Hubbard Library version (Copyright
1988, 1990) Hardback edition in the "Editors Foreward" mislead the
reader into thinking that the book is the original PLUS ADDED MATERIAL. They
fail to mention they deleted nine apparently "non-essential" chapters
from the original "By L. Ron Hubbard" work.
It's very
hard for me to believe that LRH ordered the original 9 chapters removed from
NSOL. Can you picture RON saying "I want those essential chapters on
freedom and communication deleted NOW!"
What's even
more interesting is this revised Hardback edition came out in 1988 which is two
years after the death of LRH. What are the chances of LRH authorizing these
deletions considering this time frame?
It kind of
makes one wonder. As you know, I don't take changes to LRH works too well. There
better be accessible proof somewhere to find out this was authorized by him.
Public Relations in the church says I have to join the Sea Org to get proof.
But that's another can of worms for another thread.
Why is it
so hard to authenticate LRH works? It should not be this hard to keep point
nine of KSW in. Remember what that is?
"Closing
the door on ANY possibility of incorrect technology."
Amazingly,
I'm getting CI (counter-intention) to this by some alleged Scientologists, even
Robert of the Public Relations of the Church of Scientology, Inc. himself!
12) Does
any Scientologist here disagree with the idea of having copies of all original
LRH handwritten works in the qual of each org to so each Scientologist has the
ability to easily take personal responsibility for quick authentication?
13) Does
any Scientologist here disagree with having the original works of L. Ron
Hubbard preserved on microfilm for all Scientologists to see?
I can't
believe I'm getting CI to this idea by Public Relations.
Why would
this be? I'm looking for the right why. I hope you do too.
Safe
Jb Trendy : Great
article right on the spot dear Safe! And good final question that I'm sure
you've got tons of answers for that I'ld be very eager to read about. but let
me guess: could it be that actual PR of the official incorporated $cientology pretended religion had turn into the most mind
and life control totalitary cult that uses LRH works to anihilate power of
choice from every member to suck their energy in terms of money and "élan
vital" (excuse my french but thus defined in the tech dictionary by Ron
for the word Theta "élan" meaning surge to express Spiritual realm)
under the usurpated domination of the new management despotified by the sold to
the vested interests David Miscavidge and his CST (Church of Spiritual
Technology) run by IRS agents to shutter our quest for freedom turning it into
a utterly suppressive activity. All2U Trendy
Progressive
Scientology 22.10.12
What is a
high-toned individual? Does this define most Scientologists? Does this define
the product of the Church of Scientology, or the independent field? It should.
"A high-tone individual thinks wholly
into the future. He is extroverted toward his environment. He clearly observes
the environment with full perception unclouded by undistinguished fears about
the environment. He thinks very litt
le about
himself but operates automatically in his own interests. He enjoys existence.
His calculations (postulations and evaluations) are swift and accurate. He is
very self-confident. He KNOWS [italics in the book] he knows and does not even
bother to assert that he knows. He controls his environment."
"The degree of extroversion of the
preclear and, with that, his ability to face future threats and reach toward
future goals determine his height on the tone scale."
L. Ron Hubbard, (Advanced Procedures and
Axioms, 1951)
Jb Trendy Yo Safe, that's a hell of a good teaser to join in your site and launch the rebellion. Very well done !!! You can count me in. John Bartist Trendix Ex SO Exec
